The Death of a Conservative
Icon
William F. Buckley, RIP
Editor's Note: Thomas's commentary is in blue and
Marcie's is in purple.
On 27 February, conservatives
were shocked to hear the news that William F. Buckley, Jr., the
founder of National Review, died at his home in Connecticut.
He was found at his desk. While they haven't stated how he died,
but it's known that he was suffering from diabetes and emphysema.
We're sure that that is exactly how he would've wanted to go as
he was always working, even in "retirement." This is,
quite literally, the death of an American icon. Had he not created
National Review, the modern conservative movement wouldn't
be alive today. With the creation of the magazine, he created
the tent with which all conservatives are under. The man, in short,
made the "conservative" family. We know that family
might be the right term. In fact, we're pretty sure that Bill
Buckley could find a better word than that. But it can't be denied
that the man who occasioned himself as an "on and off"
libertarian/conservative had given all of a home where we were
welcomed, and one in which we could plan and brainstorm. Face
it, in the post-World War II era in American politics, we were
watching a cavalcade of collectivism from the liberal intelligencia.
In 1955 when he founded National Review,
with $100,000 at the age of 29, it was a bold move. The talking
points ports were dominated by a media that was certainly far
more favorable to the Left than the Right. The idea of any sort
of serious intellectuals even considering a conservative ideological
view was a rarity. Mr. Buckley bucked the system, and did exactly
that. The mission of National Review was to "stand
athwart history yelling Stop," and that is precisely what
he and his magazine did. He declared war on the liberal establishment
and its continuously encroaching ideology across America. And
that war carried over the magazine to "On The Right",
his biweekly syndicated column carried in over three hundred newspapers.
Lord knows why the papers would have brought him on board. Many
people have seen him debate on television, and they know that
he loved being on the short end of the odds. Recall the infamous
feud with Gore Vidal where Mr. Vidal continually called him a
"pro-war, crypto-Nazi." Mr. Buckley's infamous retort
is still relevant today with his feisty, quick-witted nature:
"Now listen, you queer, stop calling me a crypto-Nazi or
I will sock you in your goddamn face, and you will stay plastered."
Words were his weapons, much like they
are ours. He could launch a scathing indictment of liberals, or
their bass-ackwards beliefs, leaving most of the stuttering and
stammering even as they used the dictionary to figure out what
exactly they were called. And what's more interesting is that
English wasn't his language. His first language was Spanish, and
his second language was French. This lent to the idiosyncratic,
erudite English he used. Some called him snobbish because of his
accent and his voluminous vocabulary. One reader at National
Review's The Corner commented upon hearing the news of his
passing "I'm sure the Good Lord told his angels "Bring
me a dictionary. Buckley's coming." And even those that he
eviscerated, either through the pen or through the spoken word,
had respect for him. Norman Mailer is no fan of his beliefs, but
even he said the man had an excellent stage presence. He even
delighted in taking flak from critics. Arthur Schlesinger remarked
that he was "the scourge of liberalism." Rumor has it,
he sent a thank you note to Schlesinger. If the story is true,
we're sure Mr. Schlesinger was befuddled by the note. "Thank
you for referring to me in this fashion. While I could have found
a better idiom, I accept your statement. And I pledge that I shall
endeavor to do better so you will not forget me. Sincerely, WFB."
The man wrote more in a lifetime than most
politicians or federal judges do. Indeed, almost 4.6 million words
of his 5600 columns, "On The Right," would fill over
forty-five medium sized books. He did not simply take on liberals
though. He took on conservatives that he believed would seriously
damage the stated goals of the movement. He lambasted Robert Welch
of the John Birch Society at the time when Barry Goldwater was
mulling over his Presidential run. He published a review of Ayn
Rand's Atlas Shrugged by Whittaker Chambers. She never
forgave him for it, going so far to leave any room he would enter
in a theatric fashion. Heh. Some people simply cannot handle criticism.
The New York Times posted an obituary of this man which
was more than fair. After reading it, we skimmed though the comments
and noted something very interesting. While many were liberals,
most said they had read him and they respected him. A far cry
from what we know of liberals today who deride conservatives,
and wish them nothing but malice.
He was not just contained to political
writings. He had a mildly successful series of spy novels, first
published in 1976 (twelve novels in all), and an additional eight
novels done separately. The Corner was quite somber on
that Wednesday morning with the majority of the pundits sharing
their condolences, but more importantly they spoke of the man
himself. They didn't dwell on his death as though it was their
own, but rather they celebrated his life, in an almost wake-like
way. Forget the astute and lofty record he racked up over a lifetime
of conservative activism. They all agreed that no matter how bad
things looked in the world, even their own little worlds, Bill
Buckley was always smiling and upbeat. He was kind and gentle
to all who knew him, and was always there when someone needed
help. I'm sure liberals are astounded to find a conservative that
doesn't fit into their talking points, and Buckley never did quite
fit their stereotypes. Above all, he was a deeply devoted man
to his wife, to his family, and to his "family." He
was always working to improve the world he lived in, not just
for himself, but for future generations to come. In fact, he did
more in a lifetime than most elected officials did, and he was
certainly more influential than most presidents in the last sixty
years.
They say you can judge a man by his life's
works. If that is indeed the case, then the choirs of angels shall
surely sound the trumpet when Mr. Buckley enters the heavenly
gates. No one man has done more for the good of a nation than
he did. Truth be told, had it not been for Mr. Buckley it is conceivable
that we would not have had a Ronald Reagan. And old story goes
that he is said to have told President Reagan that he wouldn't
accept any sort of position in his administration. But President
Reagan quipped that he had considered making him ambassador to
Afghanistan (then under Soviet occupation), to which Mr. Buckley
replied he would accept but only if the President provided him
with ten divisions of bodyguards. That was William F. Buckley.
Quick with his wit, and quite thoughtful. We owe this man so much,
and it is a debt we are wholly unable to repay to him. We owe
him everything for creating the groundwork for the New Media.
While a good amount of people will mourn his passing openly, a
silent majority will do privately; a vast and enduring legacy
that cannot be tarnished. All we can do is send our condolences
to his family, and pray that he is reunited again with his lovely
wife, who passed away last year. The conservative movement has
truly lost one of it's greatest leaders. But we still soldier
on because Mr. Buckley would have preferred that. He never gave
up, and neither should we. God bless you, Mr. Buckley, and Godspeed.
He is a scholar of history, especially American
history, and the United States Constitution. She has finished
her undergrad studies, graduating with a BA in English and history
and will move onto law school this fall where she will specialize
in Constitutional Law. Together, Thomas and Marcie form the vanguard
of conservative opinion at Hamilton,
Madison, and Jay -- a blogging site devoted to advancing the
conservative cause by challenging the liberal lies and deceit
spread by the media, and espoused by the Left in general. Both
are expert debaters, and have beaten many liberals into submission
with their collective wit, and unmatched knowledge. The pair is
married, and resides in Arizona
|