The Liberal Strategy for Israel:
Hunker Down and Die
Take one for the (liberal)
team
As the war progresses in the Middle East and wave
upon wave of rockets fired by Hezbollah kill Israeli civilians
and military personal, the world hears from one of liberalism’s
premiere statesmen, opinion writer Richard Cohen:
“The greatest mistake Israel could make at the moment is
to forget that Israel itself is a mistake.” (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/17/AR2006071701154.html)
Ah, the self-importance and smugness of the chattering class!
Cohen, whose column is showcased by the Washington Post
and syndicated nationwide, continues by stating with mind-numbing
clarity that Israel would do best by letting her enemies pummel
her.
Richard Cohen is firmly of the idea that Israel should “hunker
down” and hope terrorist organizations like Hezbollah, Hamas,
and sovereign terrorist states like Iran “get distracted
and move on to something else.”
Upon reading Cohen’s op-ed, the discerning reader must
now ask oneself just what it is he means. Does Cohen mean…?
* Hamas, Hezbollah, and other terrorist factions decide to go
legit and sell the Middle East’s version of Amway products.
Or might Cohen mean…
* There is no chance for peace--ever--between Israel and the
entire Middle East, including Hezbollah and Hamas, and in that
case…
* “Something else,” means that there are no more
Jews to slaughter in Israel because there is no more Israel. That
leaves plenty of free time for Hezbollah and Hamas to plan their
next Jihad-extraordinaire—like coming to America to kill
Americans wholesale?
That may be good news for Cohen, who will undoubtedly tell the
American people through the magic of opinion journalism to “hunker
down” and wait for terrorism to “move on.”
What Richard Cohen means in this penned flatulence that masquerades
as serious commentary is that Israel should--ahem--bend over,
grab the ankles, and just take it.
And according to Cohen, why not? I mean, what’s a few million
Jews in Israel among one and a half billion Arabs and Muslims?
If Cohen’s advice were to ever be taken seriously, the obvious
answer regarding Israel is extinction.
And regarding Israel’s sovereignty? According to Richard
Cohen, Israel should not even exist.
Stupid Jewish state! How selfish is Israel to exercise the concept
of self-defense, or even more perverse to some--beltway op-ed
writers particularly--the very thought of self-preservation.
When Americans read and hear what modern-day liberals like Richard
Cohen have to say, you wonder if they are tempted to laugh at
the sheer ridiculousness of the guy, or slap a net over him.
These days, liberalism as practiced by Richard Cohen and the
paper he writes for is not a political belief system inasmuch
as it is a sickness of sorts. Symptomatic of the sickness is the
basic perversion of the concepts right and wrong, and good and
evil.
Liberals like Richard Cohen are not only wrong, but they are
dangerously wrong. Cohen cannot even bring himself to condemn
Hezbollah or Hamas. Instead, Cohen gives them a free pass, explaining
that “zealots are not amenable to reason.” But condemn
Israel for defending herself? Like bees to honey, it’s a
certainty that liberals like Cohen will always blaze forth in
doing so.
Zealots, Mr. Cohen? Do you mean the kind of zealotry that you
and the left have carried out against a sitting president in a
time of war? It is the zealotry of the absolute hated of blind
rage, or the willingness instantly to torpedo anything President
Bush is for or supportive of, for the sake of revitalizing the
left’s severe power outage in Washington.
Is that the zealotry you speak of, Mr. Cohen?
Further, I think it is breathlessly stunning how someone as positioned
as Richard Cohen is can instill thought and opinion so radically
different to anything other than the obvious truth: Israel has
every right to defend itself, and utterly destroy Hezbollah and
its patron states like Syria and Iran.
I guess when I think about it, the Washington Post has
done its readers a great service. By running these thoughtless
and hyperventilating pieces that pretend to be cogent and analytical
thought by someone such as Cohen, the Post reminds us all
regarding the stark differences between those invested in freedom
and its future, and those who are invested in the status quo,
and fear.
People like Richard Cohen are liberal simpletons, certainly.
But people like Cohen are also dangerous, and should be labeled
as such.
Finally, Richard Cohen and the Washington Post underline
why America looks rightward politically these days. Cohen further
illustrates the stark differences between the clear-eyed right
that fight this war against terrorism, and the close-eyed left
who would gladly watch America and her allies--like Israel--fall
to terrorism if only to see themselves reseated within the corridors
of power in Washington.
|