And They’re Off!
All the news that fits, they
print
I was chatting online with a friend of mine watching
CNN’s coverage of the South Carolina Republican Primary
when my friend mentioned something said by one of the political
experts they had. One of the experts said, hopefully with tongue
planted firmly in cheek, that John McCain and Fred Thompson are
working together to weaken the other candidates. Yeah, because
as we all know, Thompson is secretly a liberal Republican who
is only acting like a conservative Republican to undermine Mitt
Romney and Mike Huckabee.
For the people who believe CNN is the epitome of fine political
reporting and analysis, that was sarcasm.
Is it just me, or have the media done a horrible job covering
this election? Reading the online newspapers and magazines and
watching the cable news coverage has been more painful than watching
any of the recent “American Pie” sequels, but with
many more exposed boobs. I know journalistic standards have declined
in recent years, but there’s a big difference between declining
and devolving. And from where I sit, the New York Times
is only a couple steps up from the Weekly World News as
far as journalistic quality.
Part of the reason is what the media do every time there’s
a national election. In order to generate interest in the coverage,
the media love to set up a horse race mentality. Which candidate
is ahead? Which candidate is starting to fall back? Which candidate
will be turned into glue at the end of the election?
Take the recent coverage of Hillary Clinton and Mitt Romney,
for example. After coming in third in Iowa, reporters were wondering
if Hillary would keep going. Likewise, after a first place finish
in Wyoming and two second place finishes in Iowa and New Hampshire,
these same reporters said Romney had to win Michigan or else he’d
drop out. And in both cases, the talking heads and political experts
nodded in complete agreement. One tiny problem, though: Both Clinton
and Romney were leading in the delegate count when the “experts”
were saying Clinton and Romney were done! That’s like calling
for a retreat when you outnumber the opposing army 1000 to 1.
Then again, that’s the way the French Army does business…
Another reason for the bad media coverage of the election so
far is because of the nature of the business itself. Being in
the media, even as a special correspondent, can be highly competitive
and bitter. It’s like divorce court except that the people
who don’t get on camera don’t have to give up half
their stuff to the one who does. Once one gets “discovered”
as a reliable source of information, it gets frightfully easy
to create a psychological echo chamber where they stroke their
egos like Pee Wee Herman at a double feature. And with analogies
like that, it’s no wonder I don’t have a problem with
people asking me to appear on camera for political analysis segments.
The other reason I can think of for the declining media coverage
is us. Most Americans today don’t want to take the time
to stay on top of the political ins-and-outs because we have more
important things to do, like being entertained. I’m surprised
we haven’t seen the following exchange on a cable news network:
ANCHOR: Welcome to CNN’s coverage of Election
2008. I’m Antonio Cabrera, one of the top 16 finalists on
the fourth season of “American Idol.” Tonight, we’ll
be discussing the candidates’ plans for illegal immigration,
but first let’s go over to Carmen Electra, who will give
us the latest poll numbers. Carmen?
CARMEN: Thank you, Antonio. We talked to a bunch
of people and of those people surveyed, Mitt Romney still leads
the rest of the candidates in the “Candidate I’d Most
Like To Have a Three-Way With.” Now, if you’ll excuse
me, I have to go visit my new boyfriend, Thomas Lindaman, so I
can strip and sexually pleasure him for a week.
Okay, so I made that last part up. Sue me.
The Founding Fathers intended for our government to be interactive,
which means we have to do our homework. Relying on the media right
now to do our homework for us is like cribbing off the dumbest
kid in the class: you may get the occasional correct answer, but
it will be completely by accident if you do. Most likely, the
media won’t get any better at reporting and analysis because
they have no desire to get better, so it’s up to us to get
smarter about the process. I know it can be boring, but it’s
what we need to do.
At least until the new season of “Survivor” starts.
Then, all bets are off.
And that’s the Bottom Line.
|