Defeat Without Consequences
Gutlessness as an art form
In all my years as a sentient American citizen I
have never seen as sad, pathetic and low-class a spectacle as
the current effort by both Houses of Congress to issue non-binding
resolutions criticizing the President’s war strategy. It
is gutless beyond belief. It is sleazy and yeller and oily. It
is the very worst sort of posturing, designed to protect the resolvers
from anything resembling responsibility while giving them the
freedom to act somber and important and, most critically, bust
the President’s chops.
The previous low point was the betrayal of the South Vietnamese
in the 1970s. But at least that Congress was willing to stand
up and be counted. They took Affirmative Action to secure America’s
disgrace, but were willing to let history judge them for it.
The current bunch can’t even do that. They dare not do
anything that might smack of betraying American troops, for that
would be certain electoral disaster. They cannot be seen as being
“soft on terrorism,” although the radical base of
the Democratic Party certainly sees America as the greater villain.
No, rather than do anything mature, responsible or constitutional,
they spend their time doing the one thing they are not empowered
by anybody or anything to do – criticize the President’s
execution of the War.
Two things are clear about our current left. First, they do not
view the War on Islamic Terror as a problem for America. They
have not internalized that it is their problem. They perceive
it entirely as President Bush’s problem. They perceive this
to be his war, not theirs. Therefore, they see defeat
as his defeat. Not theirs. Not America’s. They
are as forthright about seeking defeat as they can possibly be
without it having electoral repercussions for them. Think about
that. A substantial portion of the Congress is actively seeking
to effect America’s disgrace and defeat. I guess it’s
a good thing they have no guts.
Second, it is obvious the Left remains completely married to
the Vietnam template. Part of this template stipulates that any
projection of American force for protecting or projecting American
interests is arrogant, corrupt and imperialistic. Another part
of it stipulates that America can only be saved from itself through
the energy and action of a band of heroic “dissenters.”
From this perspective it is more important to stop America from
doing harm than it is to prevent bad guys from flying airplanes
into our buildings. We represent the greater threat to the “world
community,” and We must be stopped.
While it is undeniable that a large chunk of current Democrat
leadership represents this view – being disproportionately
drawn from baby boomer radicals – it is also true that a
number of standard-issue feckless politicians have their noses
to the wind and are prepared to be as dishonorable as the polls
say they need to be. It’s quite a combination – moral
cowards and scheming lefties working together to actively find
ways to let America lose, while avoiding blame for doing exactly
that. Nothing is easier than to be a gutless wonder.
There has been some clever maneuvering around these resolutions.
The Republicans have played defense reasonably well. But my gosh
it would be refreshing to have someone get up in front of the
House or Senate and give their colleagues the vigorous dressing-down
they so desperately deserve.
The one area of solace in this sea of dangerous silliness is
that this behavior betrays the weakness of the left in general
and the Democrats in particular. The thing that prevents them
from moving from weak-kneed empty gestures to active measures
is their own weakness. They dare not do anything that is actually
meaningful. Because they know the American people don’t
want to risk success or America’s prestige. The American
people do not want what the left wants. The war in Iraq may have
proven unpopular, but the cause has not. The American people do
not want to see defeat or disgrace. They want to see us prevail.
That is what prevents the Democrats from going too far, and it
is what they need to pay careful attention to leading up to 2008.
|