The Death of Outrage
No, Really. Kill It. Now.
There sure seems to be an awful lot of outrage at
work in the world these days. It is most noticeable in the Arab/Islamic
world, where outrage is a staple component of the cultural landscape.
We saw it in the reaction to the “cartoon controversy.”
We see it in the Sunni/Shiite battles in Iraq. In fact, we pretty
much see it every time somebody says something that some Muslim
doesn’t like.
But outrage is not solely a trait of Muslims. Noooo, we have
plenty of it around these parts too. There has simply been scads
of outrage about the Dubai Ports deal. I actually heard one fellow
call into a radio talk show to declare his outrage about it. “I
am outraged!” he screamed. Then, to be sure we got the point,
he repeated it several times.
As for the left...well, outrage is the left’s preferred
method of communicating with their fellow citizens. That is the
whole point of a political demonstration - to showcase one’s
outrage under the sexy glare of television lights. One can’t
watch a Feminist news conference without hearing just how outraged
and, indeed, “pissed off” they are. One cannot watch
the NAACP in action without being treated to soaring orations
of outrage, often in rhyme!
So what is this thing called outrage? Why is it so popular? In
my opinion, it is the single most corrosive attribute of human
society. It is an emotional Molotov cocktail, often posing as
moral concern. The fact that it seems to have become our primary
means of social discourse should give us all pause for concern.
One of the interesting things about outrage is that it shifts
the focus of discussion and debate. When I get outraged, the focus
is no longer on the thing at issue (say, blasphemous cartoons).
It becomes me and my outrage. If you doubt this, just count how
many times you have seen pictures of the offending cartoons on
television news, opposed to the number of times you have seen
pictures of outraged rioting Muslims. Fomenting outrage is a tool
in the hands of charlatans and hucksters with an agenda to promote.
Whenever you see someone deliberately fomenting outrage in others,
be very, very suspicious of that person and his motives.
Outrage does not seek understanding, or a solution. Outrage instead
seeks immediate capitulation and obeisance. “I’m sorry,
please forgive me, I won’t do it again” is the only
acceptable answer. It has no interest in discussion or debate.
Indeed, it exists explicitly to sidestep debate. “Some things
are just too important to debate” is what outrage tells
us. As such it is a natural state of mind for those who don’t
want their position questioned.
Outrage also motivates the basest instincts. It does not, it
cannot, elevate the spirit or the mind. To the contrary, it causes
otherwise civil persons to descend into barbarism, content in
the knowledge that they have been given permission because, well,
because it’s outrageous!
So are there any good sides to outrage? In theory I suppose it
could be used to motivate people to take action for good purposes,
but this is unlikely. It is not often that well-intentioned ends
can be achieved through invoking base emotions. Somewhere along
the way things usually take a turn for the worst.
So why is outrage so popular? If it is so destructive, why do
we see it in east, middle east and west, on left and right? I
think because it is the language of the irrational. It fits the
needs and desires of both pre-enlightenment cultures and of post-modern
anti-intellectuals. The language of reason is not the language
of outrage. It is stomping our feet and shaking our fist at the
lightning.
Do not confuse any of this for pacifism. There comes a time to
fight, and then we must fight with eyes wide open and stout hearts.
But victory achieved through fights born of outrage usually produced
nothing of value. At best they leave a bittersweet and shallow
sense of accomplishment. At worse a hangover that begs for more
violence.
It is pretty clear that reason is not going to banish outrage
anytime soon. But the very least we can do is be wary of those
peddling it, and to not allow its mere presence to have any moral
standing. And relentlessly beat it back with reason.
|