Good News is No News
…We…Must…Not…Win
The other day it struck me that there really hasn’t
been much in the news lately regarding the state of affairs in
Iraq. This is interesting, because up until the last couple of
months there was a surge of negative reporting on a daily basis.
A cynic might be tempted to write this off as a sullen media not
wanting to report news that it does not like. I’m not a
cynical fellow. I’m more fact-based.
Luckily this interweb thingy comes in handy for end-running around
the press and doing some reality-based thinking. I did some independent
checking on U.S. casualty figures from some very non-friendly
sources. By golly, look what I found!

Now, I admit to being no expert on military strategy, but this
chart would seem to show that perhaps, just maybe, this “surge”
is doing exactly what its proponents said it would.
Why wouldn’t the mainstream media want to report that?
That sure seems like news to me.
We seem to have reached a point where the “adversarial
press” of mid-twentieth century legend has settled down
into a sullen, contrarian, solidly anti-American press. They are
dedicated to the proposition that any effort associated with conservative
or traditional American values can...not...be…allowed...to…win.
They are stunningly unpatriotic, in that they routinely place
their ideology above the interests of their country as defined
by the democratic process. That’s right. You heard me. I’m
questioning their patriotism.
After additional study, here is the picture of the mainstream
media that has presented itself.
1. Ignore good news at all costs. Self-evident
by what we are seeing now. They have spent so much time establishing
the narrative of administration incompetence and failure that
they cannot acknowledge success without undermining their template.
Of course, had they been reporting straight news all along this
would present no problem at all. By promoting a specific agenda
they have boxed themselves in.
2. Fixate on whatever can be dredged up as “bad
news.” I’m not sure if you have noticed,
but we are starting to see more and more “crazy vets”
stories showing up in the news of late. I saw one on the local
morning news just this morning abut the reported increase in mental
health issues among Iraq veterans. We have also seen stories on
the “surge” in homelessness among veterans. The subtext
of these stories is, of course, “yeah, so you might have
some sort of narrow ‘victory’ in Iraq, but at what
cost to these brave lads (victims)?” Look for this trend
to increase as the surge continues to establish peace and order.
3. Move the Goal Posts. After having spent years
using the standard of casualty rates and military success as the
standard of judgment, now that success is beginning to bubble
up in those areas, the criteria for success have been changed.
One gets the sense that even if this whole endeavor works out
precisely as the President wants it to – a humane, judicious
democracy in which children and lambs can lie down in peace –
the response would likely be “so what took so long?”
One of the unique and powerful aspects of the U.S. media is that
it arrogates to itself the standards of success and failure. And
it can (and does) change those whenever it feels the need.
4. Change the subject. When in doubt, - oh look,
a squirrel.... Or perhaps a celebrity murder, or a Paris Hilton
arrest, or a “Green Week.” One of the other interesting
and powerful aspects of the media is that it gets to choose what
to report. The power of this tactic has been mitigated by the
alternative media, but for the millions of Americans who continue
to get their news from the mainstream media, events which are
uncomfortable to the press simply “disappear”. I suppose
there is a “reverse news value” in this. By paying
attention to the “dogs not barking” we can learn a
lot about what is actually happening.
We cannot hope that this irresponsible behavior on the part of
the mainstream press will change. But by drawing attention to
it we can perhaps drive more Americans to the sources of news
that can inform them of those things the regular media chooses
to ignore. And in doing so further hasten the media’s decline
into irrelevancy.
|